[email protected]
The Burdick Law Firm<br />205.565.8909
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Burdick Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Recommendations
  • Links
  • News & Public Docs

5. Equity Reigned in by justice

4/11/2017

0 Comments

 
The Family Court and the Domestic Relations Court are courts of equity. In plain terms the idea of "equity" is doing what is right, whereas "law" is doing what is legal, or what the law dictates. Equity usually functions in those areas where there is no law to tell the court specifically what to do. Equity is also meant to function in those areas where perhaps hard and fast rules are not practical. In custody cases situations are different for every family. School, work, church and other schedules present different challenges in each case. A standardized visitation schedule does not fit every case. This simple fact has led many to believe that the court should have unlimited discretion to craft any custody/visitation schedule it desires. Unfortunately, discretion without guidelines has let to judicial decisions that accommodate the convenience of one party over another. Other considerations have crept in as well that have been elevated above the best interests of children. A tradition that stability is best achieved by geographical considerations as opposed to family relationships has become common. This tradition, despite having been debunked, continues to guide many judges. Additionally, placing emphasis on sibling relationships to the detriment of parent child relationships has caused suffering. Without legal guidelines judges have looked to other sources for guidance. Legal standards are needed in child custody matters to function much like sentencing guidelines do in criminal matters. Guidelines and standards are needed to ensure that fit parents are treated like fit parents and unfit parents are treated like unfit parents. Guidelines and standards will better ensure just and consistent outcomes. Clear legal guidelines should guide equity.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Austin Burdick

    Austin is an experienced litigation and constitutional law attorney.

    Archives

    September 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    May 2015
    February 2015
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    November 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    The following language is required pursuant to Rule 7.2, Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.