I begin with a suggestion that judges should be limited to two terms. There is an ample pool of lawyers to draw from so there is no likelihood of running out of qualified candidates. Judges in a courtroom receive considerable attention and respect. When they enter or leave the courtroom all rise to show respect for the office and for justice. This and other signs of respect such as addressing the judge as "your honor" have sometimes confused judges into believing that it is they that are important and respected. One of the beautiful things that I have learned from volunteer service at my church is that everyone is important. I have had the opportunity to be in charge of people and activities and to later be lead by those who I once lead. Changing responsibilities and roles increased my appreciation for those who I lead and those who lead me. When a leader know they will shortly become one of the group they have a tendency to treat all with respect, knowing that those they deal with may one day have charge over them. This situation would benefit our courts as well. If all judges knew that their time to serve was limited they may be less inclined to succumb to the temptation to think themselves more important than those who appear or practice before them. The risk of abuse that comes with pride or complacency would be diminished and justice promoted.
I did not grow up in a legal background. I am not a second, third, or fourth generation lawyer. I grew up in a normal working class home. I was never indoctrinated with the virtues of lawyering. I was raised in an average American home that valued liberty, justice and fairness. Common sense guided by upbringing, not legal philosophies. This common sense upbringing has affected the way that I see the law, lawyers, judges and courts. I suppose that my lack of upbringing in the law has helped me to see opportunities for change in the court system. Franz Kafka in his book The Trial wrote: "it never occurred to the Advocates that they should suggest or insist on any improvements in the system, while - and this was very characteristic - almost every accused man, even quite ordinary people among them, discovered from the earliest stages a passion for suggesting reforms...". From the perspective of litigants lawyers and courts are seen as talking too much while understanding too little. Too frequently the forest is never considered for the over analysis of a single leaf in court. When we talk too much we obscure truth. Sometimes this is by design, others by sheer habit. I have provided on this blog 7 modest suggestions that could improve the courts. By "improve" I mean, better arrive at a just outcome. I admittedly am not focused on efficiency. I am only concerned with a better product. And to the citizen (consumer) the better product is justice and fairness.
I begin with a suggestion that judges should be limited to two terms. There is an ample pool of lawyers to draw from so there is no likelihood of running out of qualified candidates. Judges in a courtroom receive considerable attention and respect. When they enter or leave the courtroom all rise to show respect for the office and for justice. This and other signs of respect such as addressing the judge as "your honor" have sometimes confused judges into believing that it is they that are important and respected. One of the beautiful things that I have learned from volunteer service at my church is that everyone is important. I have had the opportunity to be in charge of people and activities and to later be lead by those who I once lead. Changing responsibilities and roles increased my appreciation for those who I lead and those who lead me. When a leader know they will shortly become one of the group they have a tendency to treat all with respect, knowing that those they deal with may one day have charge over them. This situation would benefit our courts as well. If all judges knew that their time to serve was limited they may be less inclined to succumb to the temptation to think themselves more important than those who appear or practice before them. The risk of abuse that comes with pride or complacency would be diminished and justice promoted.
5 Comments
Vicky Burdick
5/3/2017 01:49:40 pm
Well said. Term limits should be for all public offices for the same reason.
Reply
Traci Ware
5/3/2017 03:40:27 pm
Agree 200%
Reply
11/1/2017 12:41:37 pm
Thanks for all you are doing to protect our constitutional rights. Check out how important your work is to prevent examples such as this:
Reply
8/5/2022 12:10:25 pm
This and other signs of respect such as addressing the judge as "your honor" have sometimes confused judges into believing that it is they that are important and respected. I’m so thankful for your helpful post!
Reply
8/5/2022 12:30:34 pm
If all judges knew that their time to serve was limited they may be less inclined to succumb to the temptation to think themselves more important than those who appear or practice before them. Thank you for making this such an awesome post!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Austin BurdickAustin is an experienced litigation and constitutional law attorney. Archives
September 2018
CategoriesThe following language is required pursuant to Rule 7.2, Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
|